Resources
Research
Research Papers
Paper

Advanced Computational Modeling and Data-Driven Design

Figure 1. West Lake 66, Hangzhou: Urban Cell Wall.

1 / 10

Abstract

Advancements in computational modeling and performance simulation have revolutionized architectural and urban design, enabling data-driven approaches to address sustainability, density, and programmatic change. This paper examines how computational modeling fosters flexible, performance-informed design through recent KPF projects. By integrating multi-scalar data—environmental, contextual, and site-specific—into façade, massing, and public realm strategies, it highlights an iterative, responsive, and anticipatory approach where adaptability and form-making are inseparable.

Keywords:
Computational modeling
Data-driven design
Façade
Massing design
Parametric design
Performance simulation
Placemaking
Public realm
Urban design
Urban fabric

1. Computational Process

From Form to Per(form)ance
Computational modeling, powered by parametric design tools such as Generative Components (introduced in the early 2000s), CATIA (adapted for architectural use in the 1990s), and Grasshopper for Rhino (released in 2007), has played a transformative role in architectural design over the past few decades. Initially, these tools were celebrated for their ability to unlock unprecedented formal freedom, enabling architects to explore and realize complex geometries that were previously unthinkable. This early period of parametric euphoria of the 1990s and early 2000s saw computational tools primarily driving formal experimentation and innovation.1

As the field matured, architects began leveraging these tools, not only to conceive novel forms, but also to address the challenges of constructability, transforming abstract designs into buildable architecture (see Figure 1). By the late 2000s, with a growing global emphasis on sustainability and the urgent need to mitigate climate change, computational tools evolved to integrate environmental data and performance metrics into the design process. Architects increasingly used these tools to set ambitious sustainability goals, simulate building performance, and optimize designs to minimize energy consumption and environmental impact.2

Over the last decade, this performance-driven approach has expanded in both scale and scope. Computational modeling now plays a critical role in urban design, addressing broader environmental and social challenges. Beyond optimizing individual buildings, architects use simulation tools to design public spaces that enhance outdoor thermal comfort, improve pedestrian circulation, and ensure access to quality views. This evolution reflects the profession’s broader commitment to creating spaces that are not only aesthetically innovative, but also environmentally and socially responsible.

Quote pattern

With the urgent need to mitigate climate change, computational tools evolved to integrate environmental data and performance metrics into the design process.

Computational Design in Practice
KPF believes architectural design should be at the forefront of the transformation and evolution of computational modeling. For KPF work specifically, this happens through its Design Technology groups, specifically the Computational Design, Environmental Performance, and Urban Interface teams. Over the past decade, the firm has developed and refined computational methodologies through their application on hundreds of projects worldwide. By leveraging this extensive experience, KPF has identified three primary areas where computational modeling has had the greatest impact: façade design, massing design, and public realm design.

Within each of these categories, KPF has established strategies for integrating performance metrics—such as optimizing views, solar radiation analysis, and outdoor thermal comfort modeling—into the design process. These methodologies allow for the synthesis of aesthetic, environmental, and functional considerations, ensuring that projects achieve both design excellence and measurable performance outcomes.

This paper examines KPF’s computational approach to these three categories through a series of case studies. By analyzing these projects, we aim to codify generalizable strategies that can inform future applications of computational tools across a range of design challenges.

Figure 2— West Lake 66: Layers of performance analysis: Environmental Impact

Figure 2— West Lake 66: Layers of performance analysis: Streetscape Activation (top)

Figure 2— West Lake 66: Layers of performance analysis: Urban Forces

Figure 2— West Lake 66: Layers of performance analysis: Urban Forces

Figure 2— West Lake 66: Layers of performance analysis: Environmental Impact

Figure 2— West Lake 66: Layers of performance analysis: Environmental Impact

2. Performance, Responsiveness and Optimization

Façade Responsiveness
In the era of smart buildings and interconnected systems, architectural façades have evolved from static envelopes to dynamic interfaces that engage with complex environmental, social, and technological contexts. Advances in computational modeling and data-driven methodologies have fundamentally transformed how architects approach façade performance, empowering them to design adaptable and responsive systems. These systems address the challenges of evolving urban complexity, including ambitious environmental targets, complex uses, and the integration of design value.

West Lake 66, Hangzhou
Situated at the intersection of Hangzhou’s West Lake and the Grand Canal, West Lake 66 employs computational modeling to address the challenges of a dense urban site, both through the design of performance-driven façades and in determining the location and form of the towers (as illustrated in the next section). The project is a mixed-use development that integrates a green pedestrian corridor with a series of computationally developed, terraced forms that reinterpret the relationship between architecture and landscape.

For the West Lake 66 podium, the Urban Cell Wall modules, or cells, are designed to respond to layers of programmatic use, urban visibility, and environmental impact. Humanization of materiality and scale define the multi-block wall, as each cell is crafted to the height of a person and lined with a sleeve of glazed terra cotta, nodding to the city’s rich ceramics heritage. The glazes of the terra cotta are inspired by the colors of the city and are modeled to slowly change tone as they wrap the city streets. As uses change and programs evolve over time, the cells can be updated with new active program layers, defining a new standard for the city’s urban street wall and further connecting people with place.

Figure 4— West Lake 66: The Urban Cell Wall.

Figure 4— West Lake 66: The Urban Cell Wall.

Quote pattern

In the era of smart buildings and interconnected systems, façades have evolved from static envelopes to dynamic interfaces that engage with complex environmental, social, and technological contexts.

Given the need for the façade to perform across three complex conditions—responding to changing internal programs, maximizing urban visibility, and mitigating harmful solar radiation—each with a range of performance outcomes, the project presented the challenge of addressing over 2,800 unique conditions. Since designing and constructing that number of distinct façade panels was not feasible, the design team utilized simulation tools to quantify the performance of each condition and use the results to derive form within a computational model. This process informed the development of the Urban Cell Wall system, which was designed as a three-part interchangeable assembly composed of only 21 unique and substitutable components. These components were strategically assembled to meet the performance requirements of all three conditions, while simultaneously allowing for varied cell apertures to passively manage daylighting and shading, reducing solar heat gain across the project.

A similar approach was applied to the design of the tower façade, where iterative simulations optimized performance for unobstructed views, solar shading, and reduced heat gain (see Figure 5). For instance, the façade geometry was carefully sculpted to maximize outward views toward West Lake while minimizing solar radiation, achieving a balance between environmental performance and occupant comfort. This method—leveraging computational modeling to align performance analysis with flexible, modular design systems—highlights a scalable strategy for addressing complex façade performance requirements.

Figure 5— West Lake 66: Tower façade optimization analysis.

Figure 5— West Lake 66: Tower façade optimization analysis.

Quote pattern

The glazes of the terra cotta are inspired by the colors of the city and slowly change tone as they wrap the city streets.

Data-Driven Massing Design
Performance simulation data can also play an important role in shaping the overall design of a building’s massing. Designing for views and daylight is essential to enhance user experience, improve environmental performance, and maximize value. However, these objectives often present competing challenges—for instance, increasing openness to improve views can also lead to greater exposure to harmful solar radiation, resulting in glare and higher cooling loads. Leveraging computational modeling that incorporated view vectors, solar trajectories, and contextual elements, the design team was able to navigate these trade-offs, enabling the creation of building forms that are visually responsive to their surroundings, energy-efficient, and comfortable for occupants. This approach extends beyond simply optimizing for daylight and views, offering a framework that bridges aesthetics, occupant comfort, and sustainability.

Westlake 66 Master Plan, Hangzhou
In addition to informing façade design, computational tools were instrumental in shaping and positioning the building massings of Westlake 66. Data-driven strategies guided key design decisions for the development of the six buildings within the master plan. A computational design model was used to generate and evaluate thousands of massing options, each analyzed against performance metrics such as solar exposure, shadow impacts, internal daylighting, and visibility. This iterative process enabled the design team to balance competing priorities, including minimizing shadow impacts on surrounding contexts, maximizing daylight penetration, and ensuring optimal retail visibility at the ground level. The resulting massing strategy reflects a contextual, performance-driven approach, culminating in the creation of a porous urban composition centered on the 400-m long Sky Park, which enhances connectivity and accessibility across the site (see Figure 6).

The core computational strategy employed in this project involved generating and analyzing thousands of massing options, using simulation data for views, daylight, and other performance metrics (see Figure 7). This iterative process allowed the design team to balance trade-offs, optimize outcomes, and create a massing solution that successfully met performance goals, while remaining sensitive to its urban context.

Figure 7— West Lake 66: Sample of computationally generated massing options, ranked by performance.

Figure 7— West Lake 66: Sample of computationally generated massing options, ranked by performance.

Public Realm Performance
As outlined in the introduction, the application of computational modeling has expanded beyond building performance to include public realm performance, placing a new emphasis on how data can inform the design of more active, walkable, and vibrant spaces. A data-driven approach to placemaking focuses on three key elements: understanding where people are likely to go (pedestrian routing analysis), what they are likely to see (visibility analysis), and how they are likely to feel (outdoor thermal comfort analysis). Unlike traditional building-focused performance metrics, these analyses prioritize the human experience, offering insights that inform decisions such as building massing, the placement of circulation elements, programmatic organization, and the design of shading and landscape features.

By leveraging these tools, architects and planners can create public spaces that are not only functional and comfortable, but also socially engaging, fostering connectivity, accessibility, and a sense of place.

One Vanderbilt Avenue, New York City
One Vanderbilt Avenue, a 59-story office building in the heart of Midtown Manhattan, is directly connected to Grand Central Terminal, linking commuters to Metro-North, the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR), and the subway. A primary driver of the design was reducing both existing pedestrian congestion and the anticipated increase in foot traffic from the introduction of the LIRR connection. To address this, the design team employed advanced computational tools to simulate pedestrian routing under both current and projected conditions. These simulations informed key design decisions about how One Vanderbilt’s connections to the transit system could most effectively alleviate congestion (see Figure 8).

The process required integrating data from a neighborhood-wide Environmental Impact Statement, modeling the complex 3D pedestrian network, and applying origin/destination pedestrian modeling simulations to capture movement patterns. Based on this analysis, the design incorporated strategic interventions such as pedestrianizing Vanderbilt Avenue, setting back and angling the ground floor to expand circulation space, and widening underground connections. As a result, One Vanderbilt Avenue saves commuters an estimated 123,000 hours per year that would otherwise have been lost in pedestrian congestion.

This level of congestion reduction and optimization was only achievable through computational modeling, which enabled the design team to quantify movement patterns, anticipate future challenges, and propose targeted solutions that enhance both the commuter experience and the building’s urban integration (see Figure 9).

Figure 8— One Vanderbilt Avenue: The tower’s ground plane.

Figure 8— One Vanderbilt Avenue: The tower’s ground plane.

Figure 9— One Vanderbilt Avenue: Analysis of additional daily passengers. Currently 100,000 passengers arrive per day using Metro-North. Plus there will be 94,000 arriving per day through East Side Access.

Figure 9— One Vanderbilt Avenue: Analysis of additional daily passengers. Currently 100,000 passengers arrive per day using Metro-North. Plus there will be 94,000 arriving per day through East Side Access.

Quote pattern

One Vanderbilt Avenue saves commuters an estimated 123,000 hours per year by easing pedestrian congestion—achieved through strategic design moves like pedestrianizing Vanderbilt Avenue, expanding circulation space, and widening underground connections.

Huamu Lot 10 – The Summit, Shanghai
The project is conceived as an integrated nexus of culture and commerce, responding to the complexities of its urban context. This project reclaims an abandoned riverfront, transforming it into a new public space, while its three towers are connected through dramatic cantilevered sky galleries, forming a physical and visual dialogue with the adjacent museum.

Parametric analysis and environmental data were central to the building placement and cantilever positioning, ensuring the project’s alignment with site forces and pedestrian comfort (see figures 10, 11, and 12). By analyzing site-specific wind patterns, solar exposure, and pedestrian movement, the massing was carefully configured to optimize passive cooling and shading while enhancing the urban experience. The strategic placement of the buildings channels beneficial summer breezes through the site, improving thermal comfort in the public realm.

Architectural overhangs and landscape integration further reinforce shade and cooling, creating an inviting microclimate for year-round activity. The cantilevers are defined by their reflective and hammered soffits, and are computationally positioned to maximize views and provide solar comfort along pathways of high pedestrian activity, creating a new datum that grounds the project in its urban setting.

Figure 10— Huamu Lot 10 – The Summit: Environmental performance optimized with computational modeling.

Figure 10— Huamu Lot 10 – The Summit: Environmental performance optimized with computational modeling.

Figure 11— Huamu Lot 10 – The Summit: Performance parameters applied to window wall assembly.

Figure 11— Huamu Lot 10 – The Summit: Performance parameters applied to window wall assembly.

Figure 12— Huamu Lot 10 – The Summit: Building massing and cantilevers.

Figure 12— Huamu Lot 10 – The Summit: Building massing and cantilevers.

T. Rowe Price Headquarters, Baltimore
The T. Rowe Price Headquarters establishes a new benchmark for sustainable design along Baltimore’s harbor front, utilizing advanced parametric tools and environmental data to inform site positioning, massing, and performance.

Departing from the traditional approach of compact, cost-optimized office buildings, the project embraces a design philosophy centered on community connection, environmental responsiveness, and the creation of a flexible, future-focused workplace (see Figure 13).

Figure 13— T. Rowe Price Headquarters: Positioning, massing, and performance analysis. optimized with computational modeling.
Figure 13— T. Rowe Price Headquarters: Positioning, massing, and performance analysis. optimized with computational modeling.
Figure 13— T. Rowe Price Headquarters: Positioning, massing, and performance analysis. optimized with computational modeling.

Figure 13— T. Rowe Price Headquarters: Positioning, massing, and performance analysis. optimized with computational modeling.

Through the integration of advanced environmental analysis, the building’s massing
was strategically positioned and shaped to maximize views and enhance site-wide comfort. Parametric studies optimized massing orientation to increase daylighting strategies to minimize reliance on artificial lighting.

The project’s massing also plays a critical role in enhancing occupant comfort. By carefully shaping the building to deflect harsh winter winds and channel beneficial summer breezes into the central courtyard, the design passively improves thermal comfort across the site.

This effect is further amplified by a thoughtfully designed landscape, incorporating tree canopies for passive cooling and shading. Together, these elements create a pedestrian-friendly environment that advances outdoor comfort while reinforcing the project’s commitment to sustainability (see Figures 14 and 15).

Figure 14— T. Rowe Price Headquarters: Entrance and lobby.

Figure 14— T. Rowe Price Headquarters: Entrance and lobby.

Figure 15— T. Rowe Price Headquarters: Sample of computationally-generated massing options, ranked by performance.

Figure 15— T. Rowe Price Headquarters: Sample of computationally-generated massing options, ranked by performance.

Quote pattern

Advanced environmental analysis shaped the building's massing to maximize views and enhance comfort. Parametric studies optimized orientation, increasing daylight to reduce artificial lighting.

To address these limitations, the design developed into a “Smart Trellis,” a system capable of providing dynamic thermal comfort throughout the year while remaining stationary. By leveraging weather data—specifically sun angles and solar radiation—Track’s design uses simulation tools to analyze the sun’s position and intensity throughout all hours of the year and computationally determine the most effective angle of shading for each part of the trellis. Rather than physically moving to block the sun, the trellis’s design strategically responds to the sun’s movement, casting transient, site-specific shadows that adapt to seasonal and daily variations. The trellis ensures shaded circulation paths during hot conditions and sunlit paths during colder periods, all while allowing filtered light to create shifting, dappled patterns along its edges. This approach not only prioritizes thermal comfort but also introduces a continuously evolving spatial experience (see Figure 16.)

This computational methodology represents the next evolution in performance-driven design, demonstrating how computational tools can craft solutions that seamlessly balance environmental sustainability, year-round usability, and experiential richness in the public realm (see Figure 17).

Figure 16— Track: Extrapolation of sun angles based on thermal comfort criteria throughout the year.

Figure 16— Track: Extrapolation of sun angles based on thermal comfort criteria throughout the year.

Figure 17— Track: Initial shading geometry based on thermal comfort angles.

Figure 17— Track: Initial shading geometry based on thermal comfort angles.

Figure 17— Track: Analysis of ideal shading conditions throughout a given day.

Figure 17— Track: Analysis of ideal shading conditions throughout a given day.

Quote pattern

Computational tools can craft solutions that seamlessly balance environmental sustainability, year-round usability, and experiential richness in the public realm.

Conclusion

This paper has explored three key applications of computational modeling—façade, massing, and public realm design—demonstrating how performance-driven strategies address complex challenges while enhancing design outcomes. Each approach uses data to balance competing priorities, from environmental performance to user experience.

In façade design, as seen in the Urban Cell Wall system, computational tools enabled the creation of adaptable components that optimized shading, daylighting, and constructability. For massing design, projects like West Lake 66 and T. Rowe Price Headquarters used iterative modeling to balance daylight, views, and urban context, resulting in a cohesive, high-performing master plan. In the public realm, One Vanderbilt Avenue, Huamu Lot 10 – the Summit, and “Track” showcased how pedestrian routing, visibility analysis, and temporal shading strategies can create vibrant, year-round spaces that prioritize comfort and connectivity.

These methodologies represent the current evolution of computational modeling and highlight their power to navigate complexity and deliver sustainable, human-centered solutions. As cities face unprecedented density and climate challenges, these tools enable architects to create buildings and public spaces that meet environmental goals while fostering livable, active environments.

References

1 Schumacher, P. (2009). “Parametricism: A New Global Style for Architecture and Urban Design.” Architectural Design 79 (4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.912.

2 Kolarevic, B. and Malkawi, A. (eds.) (2005). Performative Architecture: Beyond Instrumentality. London: Spon Press.

Unlock new levels of knowledge.

Explore our entire research archive and its vast collection of documents, reports, and multimedia resources. Hosted on the Engage platform, it is a treasure trove of new ideas and proven best practices.

Go to Engage

You have added this page to your collection.

You can view or share your full collection.